Home › Publications

Publications

eSnurra is well published and has a good academic and clinical foundation.

eSnurra papers

  1. Eik-Nes SH, Blaas HG, Grøttum P, Gjessing HK. OC20. 01: Predicting remaining time of pregnancy.a new approach to the prediction of day of delivery. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;26(4):341-341.
  2. Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P, Gjessing HK. Regarding “Term prediction with ultrasound: evaluation of a new dating curve for biparietal diameter.” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006;85(10):1276-1278.
  3. Eik-Nes SH, Blaas HGK, Grøttum P, Gjessing HK. OP08. 01: Predicting remaining time of pregnancy.a new population-based approach for the prediction of day of delivery based on Femur length. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;30(4):478-478.
  4. Gjessing HK, Grøttum P. Accuracy of second trimester fetal head circumference and biparietal diameter for predicting the time of spontaneous birth. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2007;35(4):350-351; author reply 351-352.
  5. Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;30(1):19-27.
  6. Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Økland I, Eik-Nes SH. Comment and reply on: prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: an independent method from estimated date of conception. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal medicine. 2010;23(8):944.
  7. Økland I, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. Biases of traditional term prediction models: results from different sample-based models evaluated on 41 343 ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;36(6):728-734.
  8. Økland I, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eggebø TM, Eik-Nes SH. A new population-based term prediction model vs. two traditional sample-based models: validation on 9046 ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011;37(2):207-213.
  9. Økland I, Bjåstad TG, Johansen TF, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. Narrowed beam width in newer ultrasound machines shortens measurements in the lateral direction: fetal measurement charts may be obsolete. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011;38(1):82-87.
  10. Økland I, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. OP32. 01: The importance of standardizing pregnancy dating models. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;40(S1):151-152.
  11. Økland, I. Biases in second-trimester ultrasound dating related to prediction models and fetal measurements. Doctoral Thesis at NTNU, 2012:4.
  12. Økland I, Nakling J, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. Advantages of the population-based approach to pregnancy dating: results from 23020 ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;39:563–568.
  13. Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Økland I, Eik-Nes SH. Fetal weight monitoring and birth weight prediction: A new population-based approach Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016
  14. Gjessing HK, Pregnancy Dating/Svangerskapsdatering. Norwegian Journal of Epidemiology – Festschrift for Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) 50 years. Vol 27, No 1-2 2017.